). Distribution of snow accumulation on the Svartisen ice cap, Norway, assessed by a model of orographic precipitation. Hydrological Processes, 22(19), 3998-400.
Other international
Crochet, P., Jóhannesson, T., Sigurðsson, O., Björnsson, H. & Pálsson, F. (2008). Modeling precipitation over complex terrain in Iceland. In: Sveinsson, Ó. G. B., S. M. Garðarsson and S. Gunnlaugsdóttir (eds.), Northern
/ces/publications/nr/1940
was chosen because after 1980 sea ice is fully initiated in RCAO
and after 2006 the records from the weather-stations end. (The stations actually continue to
4
Figure 2: mass balance profiles calculated using RCAO (Plot a) and
HIRHAM4 (Plot b) for model input.
measure, but in the short time available for the Paakitsoq mass balance project we did not
look for more data.) The reference period
/media/ces/ces_geus_paakitsoq_full_report.pdf
and the geographic extent of Figure 1b. Except where indicated, all networks are operated by
IMO, which displays data in real-time at http://www.vedur.is/english/. (b) Map of the Vat-
najökull ice cap, showing the 1 November 2004 eruption site and located earthquakes in the
month preceding the eruption. Epicenters in Skeidarárjökull outlet glacier represent icequakes
induced by the jökulhlaup
/media/jar/myndsafn/2005EO260001.pdf
are listed in Table 12.
Table 11. Hypotheses in Table 12 explained.
Hypothesis
A There is more warming in the north of Iceland
B There will be more warming in winter than in summer
C The total precipitation amount will increase
D The wind speed will decrease in the future
Table 12. The hypotheses in Table 11 compared to the findings of our study and six
others. A question mark (?) indicates
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2017/VI_2017_009.pdf
from October 5, 2004
- spatial resolution: 40x40 m
- accuracy: 10 m in elevation and 30 m in horizontal position
b) SPOT 5 HRS from August 14, 2004
c) EMISAR from August 12, 1998
- reference map for co-registration and offset correction
- spatial resolution 5x5 m
- accuracy <2 m in elevation and 5 m in horizontal position
d) aerial photographs from the 1980s:
i. Torfajökull ice cap (To) from
/media/ces/glacier_mass_balance_poster.pdf
Swe). CLIMATOOL
12:15 - 13:15 lunch
13:15 p6 Rolf Johnsen (Region Midt, Dk). Climate change adaptation - Collaboration and innovation in society, science and industry is needed
13:45 - 15:15 parallel break-out sessions:
Case A: Local but comprehensive case: Horsens fjord - Introduction by Jes Pedersen
Case B: Road infrastructure planning & operation case - Introduction Heikki Tuomenvirta
/nonam/workshop/program/
not representative of present or future climate
conditions?
Winter mean T in Helsinki (1961-2008)
1961-
20081961-
1990
Temperature (°C)
P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
-12 4
Simplest case: change in mean climate,
with no change in the magnitude of variability
If variability changes as well, the two tails of the distribution
(e.g., warm and cold) will be affected differently.
IPCC (2001
/media/ces/RaisanenJouni_CES_2010.pdf
)
Best case (1.5 C increase; 2%
increase in prec)
BAU A B
Change +30 % C D
Scenario
combination
Impact
Adaptation measures
North South North South
A *
CC: Possible increase in the
amount of snow more
snow clearing increase in
operational costs
S-E: increase in traffic
volume increased wear of
roads increase in
maintenance cost.
**
CC: Possibly less snow,
more rain
/media/loftslag/Group3-The-future-of-the-Finnish-national-road-network.pdf
telecommunication
Accommodation (GPS coordinates) and other places you plan to visit/stop at
Few words about the equipment
Plan B
Travellers can leave their travel plan with ICE-SAR, provided it includes a contact or relative whose responsibility is to alert ICE-SAR if the travellers do not arrive at the right time. ICE-SAR also provides a more extensive service with shared responsibility
/about-imo/news/nr/2497