and Irrigation
Current climate 560 23 264 243 10 18
A2 scenario + 74 (13%) 0 + 50 (19%) 0 0 + 16 (89%)
B2 scenario + 118 (21%) +1 (4%) + 84 (32%) + 20 (8%) 0 + 9 (50%)
aWater balance values are in millimeters. Relative changes are in parentheses.
Table 4. Spatially Averaged, Mean Monthly Recharge for the
Current Climate and the A2 and B2 Scenarios for the Simulation
Without Abstractions
/media/loftslag/vanRoosmalen_etal-2009-WRR_2007WR006760.pdf
A (A1, A2, A3). ........................................................................................... 89
Figure B.2. Rake distribution for mapped faults/clusters in box B, Fagradalsfjall-W. ...... 90
Figure B.3. Rake distribution for mapped faults/clusters in box C, Fagdaralsfjall-E. ....... 90
Figure B.4. Rake distribution for mapped faults/clusters in box D, Kleifarvatn
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2010/2010_003rs.pdf
; (1)
where N is the number of years between the elevation
maps, A1 is the average area (m2) of the ice cap over N
years, r is the scaling factor from the density of ice
(900 kg m3) to water (1000 kg m3),
DV D ¯hA2; (2)
is the total volume loss (m3), D ¯h is the N year area-
average elevation change (m) for the whole ice cap and
A2 is the maximum area (m2) of the ice cap.
In this study we use
/media/ces/Gudmundsson-etal-2011-PR-7282-26519-1-PB.pdf