M A M J J A l
ll lllllll
lll
ll
lll
0 100 200 300
60
0
80
0
100
0
Days since Sept. 1st
Q
(m
³/s
)
vhm102
S O N D J F M A M J J A
lll
ll
lllllllllllll
ll
llllll
0 100 200 300
30
40
50
60
70
Days since Sept. 1st
Q
(m
³/s
)
vhm116
S O N D J F M A M J J A
llllllllllllllllllllllllll
0 100 200 300
20
0
30
0
40
0
50
0
Days since Sept. 1st
Q
(m
³/s
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/VI_2015_009.pdf
Knowledge
gathering
Proposal
Testing
Revision
Decision-
making
Milestones
26 August 2011 PM/YZ/EPP 5
Phase
s
Du
r
at
i
o
n
(
mon
t
h
s
)
O
V
I
s
Problem iden
t
i
f
i
ca
t
i
on
2
A
ll
St
a
k
ehol
d
e
r
s i
d
ent
i
f
i
ed an
d
selected wi
t
h
i
n 2 mo
n
t
h
s
I
n
f
o
r
ma
t
i
on pro
v
i
s
i
on
2
Kic
k
-
of
f
m
e
et
i
n
g
hel
d
Knowled
g
e ga
t
he
r
i
n
g
6
/media/loftslag/Group5-Stakeholders_involvement.pdf
). This can be helpful with respect to
finding a common structure in presenting as well in session reporting (for which angles
mentioned in the opening session statements of the Workshop participants can provide
checkpoints).”
Session rapporteur allocation
M
o
n
d
a
y
2
9
.
8
Y
u
a
n
g
Z
h
e
n
g
A
t
h
a
n
a
s
i
o
s
V
o
t
s
i
s
E
i
v
i
n
d
J
u
n
k
e
r
M
i
c
h
a
e
lL
a
i
h
o
H
e
c
to
r
/media/loftslag/Guidelines2-for-rapporteurs.pdf
) and changing climate (CC:CC)
1. Current climate (CU)
- varying thinning regimes
(0%, 15%, 30%,45%)
2. Changing climate (CC)
- varying thinning regimes
(0%, 15%, 30%,45%)
3. Current (CU) &
changing climate (CC)
- current thinning regime
4. Current (CU) &
changing climate (CC)
- changed thinning regimes
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
M
ea
s
u
r
e
m
en
t
s
o
f
c
l
i
m
a
t
e
p
/media/ces/CES_BioFuels_Flyer_new.pdf
Time
Main assortments
ll d Energy biomassSaw ogs Pu pwoo
Small trees Residues Stumps
5
Use of biomass based energy in Finland
Pellets
1% (0.5 Mm3)
S d tForest residues
and small trees
used as chips
9% (3.4 Mm3)
aw us
9% (3.4
Mm3)
Black liquorTraditional
Energy biomass
46 TWh (55%) qu45% (18 Mm3)firewood
15% (6 Mm3)
Bark
21% (8.4 Mm3)
Energy biomass: 20% of the primary energy production
/media/ces/Alam_Ashraful_CES_2010.pdf
on the costs of
weather related delays and interruptions. Leviäkangas (2007) mentions an amount of 20 ~ 30
million euro per year. As mentioned before over time road users will start to adapt if they realize
that certain delays occur too frequently. Responses could vary from shifts in departure time to
switching to another mode or even relocation of activities.
A note on service levels
In road
/media/loftslag/Outline_for_the_case_Road_maintenance_in_a_changing_climate.pdf