81 results were found for 拉菲ll官网百度【┋添加扣46⒋1⒍85〓】.

Results:

• 11. VI_2020_008

  ................................................................................................................................. 8 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 9 ENDURKOMUTÍMI ÚRKOMU – SAMANTEKT .................................................................. 10 1 INTRODUCTION /media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2020/VI_2020_008.pdf

• 12. BIEG_windrose_2005-2014

  of wind direction (%) Aerodrome Total observations: 6845 Calm: 17% Variable winds: 3.6% Average wind speed for wind direction Wind direction (°) Wind speed (knots ) 0 5 10 15 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 N E S W N (Number of observations for wind direction) Icelandic Met Office 02. júl. 2015 40 9 60 0 29 8 14 6 6 1 5 6 4 3 6 2 8 6 3 6 2 0 3 0 1 8 2 9 11 2 12 9 15 3 36 7 33 7 44 8 46 /media/vedur/BIEG_windrose_2005-2014.pdf

• 13. CES_D2.4_task1

  in Appendix A.1. However, in analysing the precipitation climate at individual stations, the full period 1961-2008 was used where available. 17 months in late summer and most in winter). Considering the annual sum of precipitation (last panel of Fig. 4.3), the probability of wet years around the year 2050 is projected to reach 70- 85% in most of Fennoscandia and northwestern Russia. Even so /media/ces/CES_D2.4_task1.pdf

• 14. VanderKeur_etal-2008-Uncertainty_IWRM-WARM

  ith en v iro n m en ta lo bje cti ve s, be in ge co lo gi ca lly co m pa tib le 1:Ont ologica lan d ep ist em ic 2: Sc en ar io Pa rti ci pa to ry pr oc es s (PP ) imp ortan tt o de al w ith un certaint y Pa rti ci pa to ry pr oc es se s to de al w ith u n ce rta in ty . Cl os er co o pe ra tio n o fa ll th e ba sin st at es to es ta bl ish a sp ec ia l riv er au th or ity (IC PR )w ith po w er s /media/loftslag/VanderKeur_etal-2008-Uncertainty_IWRM-WARM.pdf

• 15. hafisskyrsla_04012011

  meginísnum. Hafísinn var næst landi á eftirtöldum stöðum: 1. 80 sjml VNV af Bjargtöngum. 2. 46 sjml NV af Barða. 3. 40 sjml NV af Straumnesi. 4. 41 sjml N af Kögri. Hafísröndin liggur um eftirtalin hnit (gráður og mínútur): 1. 65°43n-029°45v 2. 65°44n-028°58v 3. 66°10n-028°30v 4. 66°09n-028°05v 5. 65°52n 027°54v 6. 65°51n-027°36v 7. 65°56n-027°44v 8. 66°11n-026°42v 9 /media/hafis/skyrslur_lhg/hafisskyrsla_04012011.pdf

• 16. isskyrsla_14122010

  15.0W 9) 67 05.0N 21 52.0W 10) 66 57.0N 22 32.0W 11) 67 00.0N 23 00.0W 12) 66 38.0N 25 00.0W 13) 66 30.0N 26 40.0W Næst landi var ísinn á eftirfarandi stöðum: 1. 48 sjml vnv af Grímsey. 2. 46 sjml ana af Horni. 3. 34 sjml norður af Skagatá. 4. 25 sjml nnv af Sraumnesi. Kl 0003 Kallað í Remoy Viking k/m LLDM til að fá upplýsingar um ísinn sem hann er að sigla í gegnum /media/hafis/skyrslur_lhg/isskyrsla_14122010.pdf

• 17. VI_2022_006_extreme

  towards the northern part of Vatnajökull. Table 8 – Median 1M5 values (mm 24-h-1) for eleven hydropower catchments with and without climate projections for the period 2080 – 2100. Catchment 1M5 median value mm 24-h-1 Original RCP 2.6 RCP 8.5 10% 50% 90% 10% 50% 90% Blönduvirkjun 48 41 49 58 42 50 61 Búðarháls 46 40 47 56 40 48 59 Hágöngulón 63 55 65 76 55 66 81 Hálslón 85 75 88 104 /media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2022/VI_2022_006_extreme.pdf

• 18. aerodrome_summaries_20140603

  M (171FT ) FRE Q UENCIE S (PE R CENT ) O F OCCU R RENC E O F CONCURREN T WIN D DIRECTIO N (I N 30 0 SEC T ORS ) AN D SPEE D (I N KN O TS ) WITHI N SPECIFIE D RANGE S ANN U A L WIN D WIN D SPEE D (KT) ) DIRECTIO N CAL M 1– 5 6–1 0 11–1 5 16–2 0 21–2 5 26–3 0 31–3 5 36–4 0 41–4 5 46–5 0 >5 0 T O T A L V ARIABL E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35-36-0 1 3 2 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 02-03-0 4 0 2 4 4 3 1 0 0 /media/vedur/aerodrome_summaries_20140603.pdf

• 19. Paper-Olafur-Rognvaldsson_92

  been used to downscale over Iceland the 6-hourly analysis of the ECMWF over a pe- riod of 46 years. A systematic comparison with observed precipitation for the sub-period 1987–2003 has been presented as well as comparison of simulated discharge with observed discharge. The main results are: Table 1: Comparison of observed and simulated discharge [m3s−1] at six discharge stations using unscaled /media/ces/Paper-Olafur-Rognvaldsson_92.pdf

• 20. BIKF_windrose_2005-2014

  68 8 62 2 41 8 52 9 54 4 56 8 45 5 50 3 46 5 46 3 56 7 61 0 57 4 52 8 43 6 45 4 45 0 38 8 37 5 41 5 45 4 43 3 35 7 39 8 36 4 29 2 17 4 12 3 8 9 9 5 8 4 9 4 18 7 Wind rose BIKF February 2005−2014 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 2010360350340 330 320 310 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 1 2 3 4 5 6 Frequency of wind direction (%) Aerodrome Total /media/vedur/BIKF_windrose_2005-2014.pdf