J. Roberts
Tinna Þórarinsdóttir
VÍ 2022-006
Skýrsla
+3 5 4 522 6000
vedur@ve d u r.i s
Veðursto f a Ísland s
B ú sta ð a rve g u r 7–9
108 Reyk j a vík
Contents
1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 4
2 STUDY AREA
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2022/VI_2022_006_extreme.pdf
: Significant at 90% CL
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Fokstugu (973 m.a.s.l.)
Introduction Data & Methods Results
Trends in start and end:
Significant at 99% CL
/media/ces/Dyrrdal_Anita_CES_2010.pdf
number of parameters compli-
cates using such models.
[7] At present, very few studies have quantified the
combined effects of future climate and land use changes
on hydrology [Quilbe et al., 2008]. Pfister et al. [2004]
studied changes in peak flows in the Rhine and Meuse
basins due to climate and land use change from a historic
perspective to gain a better understanding of the dominating
processes
/media/loftslag/vanRoosmalen_etal-2009-WRR_2007WR006760.pdf
b-values for Eyjafjallajökull estimated for all events and five distinct depth
intervals using both manual fitting and the maximum curvature method.
Depth [km] #events b manual b max. curv. Mc
all relocated events 821 1.58 1.39 1.6
1.5–5 120 1.77 1.36 1.5
5–7 36 1.88 2.53 1.8
7–13 334 1.38 1.46 1.8
13–17 42 1.13/1.22 1.11 1.4
17–26 99 3.06 2.46 1.6
Figure 12. (Next page) Frequency
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2009/VI_2009_013.pdf
Impact of snow and cloud cover on the
surface energy budget over Iceland
based on HARMONIE model simulations
Nikolai Nawri
VÍ 2015-006
Report
Impact of snow and cloud cover on the
surface energy budget over Iceland
based on HARMONIE model simulations
VÍ 2015-006
ISSN 1670-8261
Report
+354 522 60 00
vedur@vedur.is
Veðurstofa Íslands
Bústaðavegur 7–9
108 Reykjavík
Nikolai Nawri, Icelandic Met
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/VI_2015_006.pdf
Comparison between data from
automatic weather stations and
manual observations
Ingibjörg Jóhannesdóttir
VÍ 2019-009
Report
Comparison between data from
automatic weather stations and
manual observations
VÍ 2019-009
ISSN 1670-8261
Report
+354 522 60 00
vedur@vedur.is
Icelandic Met Office
Bústaðavegur 7–9
IS 105 Reykjavík
Ingibjörg Jóhannesdóttir, Icelandic Met Office
Contents
1 Inngangur
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2019/VI_2019_009.pdf
& implementation
6. Information management & sharing
7. Finances and cost recovery
8. Risk management
9. Effectiveness of (international) regulation
As a useful starting point for operationalization, we
considered the River Basin Assessment framework devel-
oped by Raadgever et al. (2008). Raadgever et al. devel-
oped a framework including four regime elements (4–7).
Based on relevant literature (see
/media/loftslag/Huntjens_etal-2010-Climate-change-adaptation-Reg_Env_Change.pdf
in Finland
Noora Veijalainen a,*, Eliisa Lotsari b, Petteri Alho b, Bertel Vehviläinen a, Jukka Käyhkö b
a Freshwater Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Mechelininkatu 34a, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251, Helsinki, Finland
b Department of Geography, FI-20014 University of Turku, Turku, Finland
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 January 2010
Received in revised form 13 June 2010
Accepted
/media/ces/Journal_of_Hydrology_Veijalainen_etal.pdf
by the Icelandic
Meteorological Office, which has made it through the first round of application for the Effect
studies and adaptation to climate change program. This demonstrates show the success of the
7
investment by the Nordic system in building up the capabilities, technology transfer and
research innovation that is essential in addressing the challenges of the future in adapting to
climate change
/media/ces/ces-oslo2010_proceedings.pdf