48 results were found for 【┃稳定２17⒋31┃扣】】博E百代理.

Results:

• 11. IMO_AnnualReport2014

  ANNUAL REPOR T 2014 2 I C E L A N D I C M E T O F F I C E / A N N U A L R E P O R T 2 0 1 4 ?Veðurstofa Íslands 2015 Bústaðavegur 7–9, 108 Reykjavík, Iceland The annual report was drafted by the IMO staff. Editor: Sigurlaug Gunnlaugsdóttir Design and layout: Hvíta húsið Printing: Oddi ISSN 2251-5607 Cover photo: Gro Birkefeldt Møller Pedersen I N D E X 4 Bárðarbunga 7 Rockslide /media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/IMO_AnnualReport2014.pdf

• 12. BIKF_windrose_2005-2014

  250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 1 2 3 4 Frequency of wind direction (%) Aerodrome Total observations: 14993 Calm: 1.8% Variable winds: 0.36% Average wind speed for wind direction Wind direction (°) Wind speed (knots ) 0 5 10 15 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 N E S W N (Number of observations for wind direction) Icelandic Met Office 02. júl. 2015 31 6 58 6 57 3 /media/vedur/BIKF_windrose_2005-2014.pdf

• 13. Doctoral Student Position

  Position 18.5.2011 The Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) jointly with the Helsinki University Centre for Environment (HENVI) is inviting applications for a doctoral student position for a fixed term from 1 August 2011 to 31 December 2014. The main work /nonam/news/nr/2171

• 14. CES_D2.4_task2_CMIP3_winds

  % 6,0 % 8,0 % 10,0 % 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Fr eq ue nc y (% ) Geostrophic wind (m/s) September-April 1971-2000 2046-2065 -0,5 % -0,4 % -0,3 % -0,2 % -0,1 % 0,0 % 0,1 % 0,2 % 0,3 % 0,4 % 0,5 % 0,6 % 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 C ha ng e in % Wind class in m/s September-April change 46-71 Fig. 6. Top: 10-GCM mean frequency distributions of daily /media/ces/CES_D2.4_task2_CMIP3_winds.pdf

• 15. BIRK_windrose_2005-2014

  observations: 7484 Calm: 1.3% Variable winds: 1.1% Average wind speed for wind direction Wind direction (°) Wind speed (knots ) 0 5 10 15 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 N E S W N (Number of observations for wind direction) Icelandic Met Office 02. júl. 2015 31 3 41 2 29 3 11 2 8 5 8 5 11 2 22 3 32 8 31 0 24 7 24 2 25 6 27 1 31 9 26 4 19 5 24 4 16 4 17 9 15 7 12 2 9 9 9 0 10 8 13 7 18 3 14 4 20 0 /media/vedur/BIRK_windrose_2005-2014.pdf

• 16. BIIS_windrose_2005-2014

  E S W N (Number of observations for wind direction) Icelandic Met Office 02. júl. 2015 2 8 4 7 17 5 31 9 18 6 8 6 6 0 6 0 2 5 1 0 2 5 8 8 3 0 1 6 9 2 4 7 2 1 4 3 5 2 11 6 20 5 16 4 11 4 5 1 1 3 8 5 1 1 3 7 Wind rose BIIS April 2005−2014 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 2010360350340 330 320 310 300 290 280 270 260 250 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 160 150 /media/vedur/BIIS_windrose_2005-2014.pdf

• 17. The weather in Iceland 2009

  stations and ranking (1 = warmest, 3 = third warmest etc.). station temperature anomaly rank of Reykjavík (SW) 5.55 1.24 10 139 Stykkishólmur (W) 4.70 1.22 14 165 Bolungarvík (NW) 3.87 0.93 20 113 Grímsey (N) 3.69 1.25 10 136 Akureyri (N) 4.06 0.77 31 129 Grímsstaðir (NE) 1.62 1.12 20 103 Egilsstaðir (E) 3.92 0.98 17 60 Dalatangi (E /weather/articles/nr/1802

• 18. ved-eng-2009

  at individual stations and ranking (1 = warmest, 3 = third warmest etc.). station temperature anomaly rank of Reykjavík (SW) 5.55 1.24 10 139 Stykkishólmur (W) 4.70 1.22 14 165 Bolungarvík (NW) 3.87 0.93 20 113 Grímsey (N) 3.69 1.25 10 136 Akureyri (N) 4.06 0.77 31 129 Grímsstaðir (NE) 1.62 1.12 20 103 Egilsstaðir (E) 3.92 0.98 17 60 Dalatangi (E) 5.02 1.29 4 72 Teigarhorn (E) 4.89 1.17 /media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skylduskil/ved-eng-2009.pdf

• 19. Johannesson_Thomas_CES_2010

  Þorsteinsson IMO, IES/UI, NVE, GEUS, DMI, DES/UU, GI/UA Future Climate and Renewable Energy: Impacts, Risks and Adaptation Oslo, Norway, 31 May - 2 June 2010 Chiefs of the Hydro- logical Institutes in the Nordic Countries Nordic Council of Ministers Overview • Background • International context • Climate change scenarios • Mass balance and dynamic modelling • Ice-volume and runoff changes • Conclusions /media/ces/Johannesson_Thomas_CES_2010.pdf

• 20. Group5-Stakeholders_involvement

  /EPP 2 Stakeholders analysis 26 August 2011 PM/YZ/EPP 3 Stake h o l d e r s P u b l i c / p r i v at e P o w e r l e v e l (“ n u i s an ce” ca p a c i t y ) O r i e n tat i o n H or s t e n s m uni c ipal i t y ( c o m pe t e n t a u t h ori t y ) P u b l i c S t ron g Go v ernanc e N eighbour mun i c i p ali t y P u b l i c S t ron g Go v ernanc e Poli c y /media/loftslag/Group5-Stakeholders_involvement.pdf