and hydrologic models at
regional scale. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128(6), 1681–1706.
Grell, G. A., Dudhia J. and Stauffer D. R. 1995. A description of the fifth-
generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR Tech. Note
NCAR/TN-398+STR, 138 pp.
Jasper, K., Gurtz J. and Lang H. 2002. Advanced flood forecasting in Alpine
watersheds by coupling meteorological observations and forecasts with a dis-
tributed
/media/ces/Paper-Olafur-Rognvaldsson_92.pdf
Þórarinsdóttir, Matthew James Roberts
Skýrsla nr. Dags. ISSN Opin Lokuð
VÍ 2020-008 Október 2020 1670-8261 Skilmálar:
Heiti skýrslu / Aðal- og undirtitill: Upplag: 14
Reassessment of precipitation return levels in Iceland Fjöldi síðna: 138
Framkvæmdastjóri sviðs:
Jórunn Harðardóttir
Höfundar: Verkefnisstjóri:
Andréa-Giorgio R. Massad, Guðrún Nína Petersen,
Tinna Þórarinsdóttir og
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2020/VI_2020_008.pdf
and upward sensible and latent heat fluxes in W m 2 at the Earth’s surface on 27 July 2012
for different surface types and cloud conditions. Percentages in parentheses are relative
to the incident solar radiation flux at the top of the atmosphere (0.70 1360 W m 2, see
Table 1) for SW#, and relative to SW# for the other fluxes.
SW# LW" SH" LH" Net#
Snow-free land & Clear 502 (53%) 128 (25%) 138 (27%) 165
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/VI_2015_006.pdf
)=(θ0) + (θ1)(AP)
Rel. RMSE= 1
NS= 0.89
MAE= 71
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
ll
0 500 1500 2500
0
50
0
150
0
250
0
Pred. (m³/s)
R
ef
. (m
³/s
)
µ(D)=(θ0) + (θ1)(AP Z)
Rel. RMSE= 1.2
NS= −0.095
MAE= 161
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
l
ll
0 400 800 1200
0
50
0
100
0
150
0
Pred. (m³/s)
R
ef
. (m
³/s
)
µ(D)=(θ0) + (θ1)(AP L)
Rel. RMSE= 0.95
NS= 0.71
MAE= 138
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
ll
l
ll
0 400 800 1200
0
50
0
100
0
150
0
Pred. (m³/s
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/VI_2015_009.pdf