h
stat
us
an
d
goal
s
Locat
io
n
—
u
n
ce
rta
in
tie
s
re
la
te
d
to
So
urc
e
o
fun
certaint
y
Natur
e
(1)/typ
e(2
)o
f
u
n
ce
rta
in
ty
Co
mment
s
R
hin
e
at
(su
b-)
catch
m
en
tleve
l
W
at
er
re
so
u
rc
es
issu
es
Id
en
tif
ica
tio
n
an
d
pr
io
rit
y
settin
g
o
fu
rge
nt
wat
er
re
so
u
rc
es
pr
ob
le
m
s;
co
n
fli
ct
in
g
in
te
re
sts
amon
g
sector
s
an
d
stakeh
older
s
M
ul
tip
le
fra
m
es
(so
/media/loftslag/VanderKeur_etal-2008-Uncertainty_IWRM-WARM.pdf
course – Adaptive management in relation to climate change – Copenhagen 21-26/8/2011
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
6
Figure 1. Flow chart summarizing information and decision flows of an adaptive management inspired
adaptation planning cycle for road transport (at national strategic / tactical level)
M
a
n
d
a
t
e
f
r
o
m
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
+
p
r
/media/loftslag/Outline_for_the_case_Road_maintenance_in_a_changing_climate.pdf
TS.1b, TS.2b}
Global anthropogenic GHG emissions
F-gases
CO2 from fossil fuel use and other sources
CH4 from agriculture, waste and energy
CO2 from deforestation, decay and peat
N2O from agriculture and others
GtC
O
2-eq / y
r
28.7
35.6
39.4
44.7
49.0
The largest growth in
GHG emissions between 1970 and 2004
has come from energy supply, transport and industry, while resi-
dential and commercial
/media/loftslag/IPPC-2007-ar4_syr.pdf
inty in decision making linking pluriform uncertainty combining certified and tacit knowledge
Tommy Chan Mich el Laiho Patrick Driscoll Kare Lundgren Hector Guin a Barrientos
Eivind Junker Jussi Ylhäisi Athanasios Votsis
Karoliina Pilli-Sihvola Yuang Zheng Väi ö Nurmi Jiao Xi nj Wejs
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
no
.
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
no
.
n
a
m
e
c
o
u
n
t
r
y
d
i
s
c
i
p
l
i
n
e
(
M
S
c
.
)
1
3
/media/loftslag/programme2---PhD-Workshop-preceding-Adaptation-Research-Conference.pdf
by season (%) between
1991-2007 and 1961-1990 in the Baltic countries
1
9
0
0
1
9
2
0
1
9
4
0
1
9
6
0
1
9
8
0
2
0
0
0
-
1
5
-
1
0
-
5
0
5
1
0
1
5
P
r
e
c
i
p
i
t
a
t
i
on
a
no
m
a
l
y
(
%
)
R
e
g
i
on
1
R
e
g
i
on
2
R
e
g
i
on
3
R
e
g
i
on
4
F
un
c
t
ion
P
lo
t
5
1
9
0
0
1
9
2
0
1
9
4
0
1
9
6
0
1
9
8
0
2
0
0
0
-
1
.
5
-
1
-
0
.
5
0
0
.
5
1
1
.
5
T
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
a
no
m
/media/ces/ces_SA_group_flyer_new.pdf
dimension to current mgt. as it utilises the opportunity
provided by the surrounding environment
Energy biomass production
7
What are the challenges?
EU is committed to raise the share of renewable energy to
20% by 2020
This target for Finland is 38% by 2020
The production of energy biomass to substitute fossil fuels
I 2006 21 il 3 (46 TWh) f bi d i n 200 , 21 m . m o energy
/media/ces/Alam_Ashraful_CES_2010.pdf
example
can be given by the low cost still flood risk adaptation by implementing early warning system. But
there is one more suggestion dfor stakeholders to restrict infrastructure in the cities of Horsens.
Fiva PhD Courses : Adaptive management in relation to climate change (august 22 2011 - august 26 2011)
2 / 3
R
es
e
a
r
c
h
Flood
f
r
equenc
y
a
n
d
i
n
t
ensi
t
y
c
o
m
m
un
i
c
a
t
/media/loftslag/Group-1_Scenarios-for-AWM.pdf
activities.
Anne K. Fleig et al. “Regional hydrological droughts and weather types in north-western Europe “
University of Oslo Droughts WTs SummaryRelationsIntroduction Outlook
Hydrological drought in NW-Europe: Data
5
6
5
8
6
0
5
5
.
5
5
6
.
0
5
6
.
5
5
7
.
0
5
7
.
5
-10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25
3
5
4
0
4
5
5
0
5
5
6
0
6
5
7
0
s
o
u
r
c
e
:
N
a
t
i
on
a
l
E
n
v
i
r
on
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
s
e
a
r
/media/ces/AnneFleig_May2010_CES.pdf
& Togeby, M. (2007). Statistical Analysis. In: J. Fenger (Ed.) Impacts of Climate Change on Renewable Energy Sources: Their role in the Nordic energy system, Nord 2007:003, 154-174.
Mo, B., Wolfgang, O. & Styve, J. (2010). ”The nordic power system in 2020 - Impacts from changing climate conditions”, Conference on future climate and renewable energy: Impacts, Risks and Adaptation, 31.May-2 June 2010
/ces/publications/nr/1937
the correlation between the
different predictors:
MD(u) =
q
(X(t) X(u))TS 1(X(t) X(u)) (5)
14
where X(t) (o1(t); ::;o j(t); :::;ok(t)) and X(u) (o1(u); ::;o j(u); :::;ok(u)) denote the multivariate
feature vectors at times t and u and S the covariance matrix.
The N best analogues correspond to those N days with the lowest ED or MD score. The ED
score has traditionally been used with nearest-neighbor
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2013/VI_2013_008.pdf