by the following
general features:
a71
There is a water management or other policy
decision to be made, e.g., to determine desired
groundwater levels in a specific area or to
draw up rules for the management of an
aquifer.
a71
There is one or, more typically, several
decision makers for this policy decision, e.g.,
local water authority, municipalities, regional
decision-making bodies, the ministry
/media/loftslag/vonKorff_etal-2010.pdf
advance is only crudely modelled. The main features of the model are
Glaciers within the modelled watershed are divided into one or more groups that are
treated together more or less as one ice body each in the simplified glaciological mod-
elling.
The total ice volume is separately estimated for each group of glaciers so that the runoff
from the corresponding glaciated part of the watershed
/media/ces/ces-glacier-scaling-memo2009-01.pdf
The hydrological simulations were performed with the Wa-
tershed Simulation and Forecasting System (WSFS) developed
and operated in the Finnish Environment Institute (Vehviläinen
et al., 2005). The WSFS is used in Finland for operational hydrolog-
ical forecasting and flood warnings (www.environment.fi/water-
forecast/), regulation planning and research purposes
(Vehviläinen and Huttunen, 1997
/media/ces/Journal_of_Hydrology_Veijalainen_etal.pdf
by a
brief general discussion on the outlined features of the sector. The rest of that session was used
to deliberate on questions 1 to 3 (or 4). In the second break-out session the rest of the
questions were handled, whereas the third session focused purely on the generation of a
flowchart. After the first and third session a plenary session was held in which a summary of
findings of each parallel
/media/vedurstofan/NONAM_1st_workshop_summary_v3.pdf
ea
th
,
th
e
m
et
ho
d
u
se
d
at
th
is
st
ag
e
fo
r
th
es
e
st
ak
eh
o
ld
er
typ
es
is
sp
ec
ied
.Sh
oul
d
ther
e
be
tw
o
o
r
mor
e
model
sbein
g
develope
d
in
th
e
process
,the
n
th
e
typ
e
o
fmode
lt
o
whic
h
th
e
metho
d
wa
s
applie
d
is
show
n
in
parentheses
.O
T
re
fe
rs
to
th
e
co
m
po
si
tio
n
o
ft
he
o
rg
an
iz
in
g
te
am
.
Fo
r
o
rg
an
iz
in
g
te
am
in
vo
lve
m
en
t
in
di
ffe
re
n
t
pa
rt
/media/loftslag/Hare-2011-ParticipatoryModelling.pdf
the last 24 hours. Four quakes above M4 occurred at Bárðarbunga, the largest was M4.4 at 17:19 (2 Dec) and about a dozen between M3 and M4 in magnitude. There is little activity in the intrusion. No visibility on webcams for the time being.
NASA & USGS images sent by the Institute of Earth Sciences show the same features as described below, with a slightly clearer view; check noon 2 December and late
/earthquakes-and-volcanism/articles/nr/3055
the last 24 hours. Four quakes above M4 occurred at Bárðarbunga, the largest was M4.4 at 17:19 (2 Dec) and about a dozen between M3 and M4 in magnitude. There is little activity in the intrusion. No visibility on webcams for the time being.
NASA & USGS images sent by the Institute of Earth Sciences show the same features as described below, with a slightly clearer view; check noon 2 December and late
/earthquakes-and-volcanism/articles/nr/3055/
for
the time being.
NASA & USGS images sent by the Institute of Earth Sciences show the same features as
described below, with a slightly clearer view; check noon 2 December and late evening 2
December.
2 December 2014 10:00 - from geoscientist on duty
The last 24 hours two earthquakes, more than M5.0 have been detected at Bárðarbunga. The
first, M5.2 at 12:52 occurred in the southeastern part
/media/jar/Bardarbunga-2014_December-events.pdf
starting with the collaboration
in HIRLAM (High-Resolution Limited Area Modelling). Be-
ginning in the middle of the last decade, a new project was
begun, to combine the best features of HIRLAM and the
French Arpege model. The result is Harmonie, which has
become the basis for weather forecasts in many European
countries.
IMO began testing Harmonie in the autumn of 2011, and
has continuously
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/IMO_AnnualReport2014.pdf
in sea surface level in the North Sea/Baltic Sea system
whereas changes in sea surface level coursed by tides is small with a range of less than 0.5 m.
Figur 1. Horsens Fjord catchment. WFD main catchment area is 794 km2
NONAM Risk Assessment and Stakeholder Investment. Multidisciplinary Workshop in Reykjavík 26 – 27 August 2010 2
Physical features and ecosystem
The fjord landscape
/media/loftslag/CASE_A___Jes_Pedersen_(Region_Midt,_Dk)_Introduction.pdf