78 results were found for WA 0821 1305 0400 Borongan Pekerjaan Pintu Spandrel Aluminium Ukuran Standard Koja Jakarta Utara.

Results:

• 71. Moellenkampetal_etal-2010

  - engineering consultants, BMT WBM, and planning consultants, SJB Planning, became the contractual project manager selected by HSC. During the first project-initiation meeting, a new key procedural interest was then voiced by the HSC estuary manager. He suggested that the Australian and New Zealand Standard for Risk Management (Standards Australia 2004, 2006) be used as the basis for the LHEMP process /media/loftslag/Moellenkampetal_etal-2010.pdf

• 72. VI_2017_009

  the standard 0.44° whereas the Arctic domain does not. 12 Table 4. Differences in surface temperature between Arctic-44 and EURO-44 according to CORDEX reanalysis for the Iceland domain. The GCMs listed here are used in combination with the RCM RCA4. Avg: The average temperature difference between the domains, TAvg,Arctic minus TAvg,EURO. Max: The maximum difference in average /media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2017/VI_2017_009.pdf

• 73. Water_resources_man_Veijalainen_etal

  which is based on the Swedish HBV-model structure (Bergström 1976) and simulates the hydrological cycle using standard meteorological data. Different versions of the HBV-model have been used in assessing hydrological effects of climate change in several countries, especially Author's personal copy 3442 N. Veijalainen et al. in Scandinavia (e.g. Andréasson et al. 2004; Beldring et al. 2006 /media/ces/Water_resources_man_Veijalainen_etal.pdf

• 74. Reykholt-abstracts

  0.5 meters. The difference between the lidar DEM and the 1994 photogrammetric DEM in 10x10m resolution indicates a bias of 0.34 m for the 1994 DEM. The standard deviation of the difference between the DEMs is 1.26 m for stable areas outside the glacier. The above parameters of accuracy in orientation and DEM extraction indicate that by using lidar data as a single support it is possible /media/vatnafar/joklar/Reykholt-abstracts.pdf

• 75. VI_2020_008

  /media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2020/VI_2020_008.pdf

• 76. VI_2020_005

  /media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2020/VI_2020_005.pdf

• 77. VI_2016_006_rs

  /media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2016/VI_2016_006_rs.pdf

• 78. VI_2013_008

  runoff should be affected as well. Both weighted Euclidian distance (ED) and Mahalanobis distance (MD) were tested to select analogue situations with respect to catchment-scale predictors (methods 2 to 4): ED(u) = v u u t k j=1 (o j(t) o j(u))2 s2j (4) where s j is the standard deviation of jth variable o j over the sample set. The Mahalanobis distance is an Euclidian distance which considers /media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2013/VI_2013_008.pdf