Capacity (A)
F
r
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
control
future
+0.4std dev (as % of
mean)
-0.68max
-8.32min
-1.74mean
% change
June 2010 15
Time series
450
500
550
600
650
700
Hour
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
(
A
)
Typical year of control period
Seasonal average rating
Calculated capacity
450
500
550
600
650
700
Hour
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
(
A
)
Typical year under future scenario
Calculated capacity
Seasonal average
/media/ces/Cradden_Lucy_CES_2010.pdf
Results
W
i
n
t
e
r
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
Max snow depth
Trend slope
Number of snow days
Period II
P
e
r
i
o
d
I
I
I
Max snow depth Number of snow days
Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no
Correlation analysis (1961-08)
138 mutual stations
Introduction Data & Methods Results
Correlation with
winter
temperature
Correlation with
winter
precipitation
In warmer regions both snow
parameters
/media/ces/Dyrrdal_Anita_CES_2010.pdf
In collaboration with Ragnar Slunga, his most important contributions were in automatic estimation of fault-plane solutions for microearthquakes by inverting observed polarities and spectral amplitudes of P- and S-waves, and in relative locations of microearthquakes. Sigurður’s research thus demonstrated that microearthquakes contain information about large-scale tectonic processes.
During his student years
/earthquakes-and-volcanism/conferences/jsr-2009/sigurdur/
In collaboration with Ragnar Slunga, his most important contributions were in automatic estimation of fault-plane solutions for microearthquakes by inverting observed polarities and spectral amplitudes of P- and S-waves, and in relative locations of microearthquakes. Sigurður’s research thus demonstrated that microearthquakes contain information about large-scale tectonic processes.
During his student years
/earthquakes-and-volcanism/conferences/jsr-2009/sigurdur
Reference list:
Thomé- Scmidt, P. “Sea level change affecting the spatial development in the Baltic Sea Region.”
Geological Survey of Finland, special edition paper 41. pp. 51-59.
Van Roosmallen L., Christensen, B.S.B, Sonnenborg, T.O. “Regional difference in climate change
impacts on groundwater and stream discharge in Denmark”, 2007. Vadose Zone Journal 6: 554-571.
/media/loftslag/Rolf_Johnsen_(Region_Midt,_Dk).pdf
EA Analyse A/S and Optensys
Energianalys will forecast energy system variables, while SINTEF Energy Research will make
assumptions for the energy system in different cases, include new inputs in the EMPS model and
carry out simulations.
Cl
i
ma
t
e
Sc
e
nar
i
os
G
ro
u
p
R
i
s
ø
St
o
c
h
as
t
i
c
v
a
r
i
a
b
l
e
s
Clima
t
e
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
NV
E
S
M
H
I
FE
I
N
o
r
w
a
y
S
w
e
d
e
n
F
inla
n
/media/ces/esa_flyer_new.pdf
eruptions close to populated areas
and/or international airports
International Strategy for Disaster
Reduction (www.unisdr.org)
WMO (1999) Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Natural
Hazards WMO/TD No. 955, 92 p.
Living with Risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives
(2004)
Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction (2009)
Terminology
www.unisdr.org/eng/terminology
/media/loftslag/Karlsdottir-Risk_analysis_IMO_SK.pdf
The applied glacier mass balance model is a simplified version of the energy balance approach.
An abstract of the model is given in the following, for a comprehensive model description we
refer to Machguth et al. (2009). The model requires air temperature (Ta), global radiation
(Sin) and precipitation (P ) for meteorological input. The model runs at daily steps, and the
cumulative mass balance bc on day t
/media/ces/ces_geus_paakitsoq_full_report.pdf
in Finland. Water Resour Management (2010) 24:3437-3459. DOI 10.1007/s11269-010-9614-z.
Veijalainen N., Lotsari, E., Alho, P., Vehviläinen, B., Käyhkö, J. (2010). National scale assessment of climate change impacts on flooding in Finland. Journal of Hydrology 391 (2010) 333-350.
Yang, W., Andréasson, J., Graham, L.P., Olsson, J., Rosberg, J. & Wetterhall, F. (2010). Distribution-based scaling
/ces/publications/nr/1938
place in the same area on 5
December in 1968 (Tryggvason, 1973; Erlendsson and Einarsson, 1996; Halldórsson,
2004). A quite large event also occurred on the RP on 10 June 1933. Its best known
location is near to Fagradalsfjall, at 63.9°N and 22.2°W, and it was probably of magnitude
M 5.5 (Tryggvason, 1973; Halldórsson, 2004).
8
F
ig
ure
1
.3
.
A
m
a
p
s
h
o
w
in
g
e
p
ice
n
tr
e
lo
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2010/2010_003rs.pdf