and Torfajo¨kull but not for Eyjafjallajo¨kull, rather than an actual sensitivity difference. Effects
of cold and dry years are ignored in the uncertainty calculation.
(a) (b) Using temperature at Vı´k (c) Using temperature at Hveravellir
AAR (%)
All seasons @bn=@T
(m w. eq. yr1 8C1)
Summer @bn=@T
(m w.eq. yr1 8C1)
All seasons @bn=@T
(m w.eq. yr1 8C1)
Summer @bn=@T
(m w.eq. yr1 8C1)
E 2025
/media/ces/Gudmundsson-etal-2011-PR-7282-26519-1-PB.pdf
Numerical simulations
of precipitation in the complex terrain of Iceland—Comparison with glaciolog-
ical and hydrological data. Meteorol. Z., 16(1), 71–85.
Rögnvaldsson, Ó. and Ólafsson H. 2008. Dynamical downscaling of precipi-
tation – Part I: Comparison with glaciological data. Proceedings of the XXV
Nordic Hydrological Conference, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Tómasson, H. 1982. Vattenkraft i Island och dess
/media/ces/Paper-Olafur-Rognvaldsson_92.pdf
and Irrigationa
Scenario Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Current 101 85 59 13 6 4 1 6 39 79 8497A2 145 132 73 10 10 7 6 8 4 75 92 123
B2 137 119 75 16 6 6 6 5 21 74 110 141
aValues are in millimeters.
10 of 18
W00A15 VAN ROOSMALEN ET AL.: CLIMATE AND LAND USE CHANGE W00A15
time and larger area where groundwater levels rise above
the drain levels. Table 6 shows the mean discharges
/media/loftslag/vanRoosmalen_etal-2009-WRR_2007WR006760.pdf
mass balance of three small ice caps (with areas from 15 to 80 km2) over 6 to
20 years, were efficiently estimated from maps of glacier elevation changes deduced by SPOT
5 HRS, EMISAR and aerial photographs
• Accuracy of estimating the elevation changes, was greatly improved by using the highly precise
EMISAR DEM as a reference for co-registration and offset correction
EMISAR
Co-registration
/media/ces/glacier_mass_balance_poster.pdf