Participatory
methods and processes
for adaptive management
Dr Matt Hare
Independent Consultant, Mexico City
Adaptive and participatory water management
Matt Hare, hare@gmx.de 2011 – Summer School
About myself ...
• Bachelor in artificial intelligence (88-92)
• PhD environmental modelling in knowledge
and data-poor domains (95-99)
• Co-founder of Seeconsult GmbH (03-onwards
/media/loftslag/Hare_1_PartINONAM.pdf
for an alert system. The alert system has been in operation for almost two decades and is in further development. The SIL system also provides a basis for all the later prediction research projects.
The PRENLAB and PRENLAB-2 projects of several European countries, 1996-2000 (EC supported projects) were a direct continuation of the SIL project, but with a more multidisciplinary approach. PRENLAB
/earthquakes-and-volcanism/conferences/jsr-2009/earthquake-prediction/
Organization), which in many cases relates to Arctic issues.
The cooperation includes active participation in:
EC-PORS (Panel of Experts on Polar Observations, Research and Services)
Arctic-HYDRA (The Arctic Hydro Logical Cycle; Monitoring and Assessment Program)
GCW (Global Cryosphere Watch)
Furthermore, IMO experts take part in various workshops of:
IASC (International
/about-imo/arctic/
Projects
involving sh
Concise info
Executive
summaries
Downloadable
"Stakeholder
friendly" info
Stakeholder Relevance of the CES Project
Jenny Gode, 31 May 2010
Research programme
"Translators"
F
act
sheets
W
eb
page
Stee
ring
co
m
m
ittee
Visits
W
o
rkshops
R
efe
re
nce
g
ro
up
s
E
x
.
su
m
m
a
rie
s
M
eetings
Stakeholders
Energy companies
Energy authorities
Decision makers
Other stakeholders
/media/ces/Gode_Jenny_CES_2010.pdf
Haapala, J., Jylhä, K., Tolonen-Kivimäki, O., and
Tuomenvirta, H., 2010: Climate Change and Freight Transport. Ministry of Transport and Communications –
publication 15/2010. 98 pp. (in Finnish, abstract in English).
NONAM Workshop Reykjavik 26 & 27 August 2010 – Summary
9
Text box – questions on which was deliberated in both parallel sessions
1. Which stakeholders should be involved
/media/vedurstofan/NONAM_1st_workshop_summary_v3.pdf
in
our analyses, as will be further outlined in the
discussion.
Among these principles, we found no direct
contradictions between the guides; our corresponding
analysis can be traced with the help of the author
principle tables, A3-1–A3-4 in Appendix 3, and the
summary table in Appendix 4, Table A4.
Nevertheless, we realized that there were tensions
between several of the principles, e.g., between P2
/media/loftslag/vonKorff_etal-2010.pdf
ea
th
,
th
e
m
et
ho
d
u
se
d
at
th
is
st
ag
e
fo
r
th
es
e
st
ak
eh
o
ld
er
typ
es
is
sp
ec
ied
.Sh
oul
d
ther
e
be
tw
o
o
r
mor
e
model
sbein
g
develope
d
in
th
e
process
,the
n
th
e
typ
e
o
fmode
lt
o
whic
h
th
e
metho
d
wa
s
applie
d
is
show
n
in
parentheses
.O
T
re
fe
rs
to
th
e
co
m
po
si
tio
n
o
ft
he
o
rg
an
iz
in
g
te
am
.
Fo
r
o
rg
an
iz
in
g
te
am
in
vo
lve
m
en
t
in
di
ffe
re
n
t
pa
rt
/media/loftslag/Hare-2011-ParticipatoryModelling.pdf