close the resulting forecasts of our models are to our expectations or should
they depend on numbers like 2.5 (km) that happens to be one fourth of 10? How scientific is
25
that? Clearly, no one weighting scheme is absolutely correct and therefore we choose to
abandon weighting schemes.
When fitting model (1) to the dataset it became clear that the least squares estimate involved a
value of g
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2009/VI_2009_012.pdf
This distribution suggests a
division of the study domain into three sectors, where the presence of cyclones in different sec-
tors can be seen as being indicative of different modes of the MSLP field. The average mid- and
upper-level tropospheric circulation involved in forming cyclones in the different sectors is dis-
cussed in Section 6, while the impacts on surface weather conditions, associated
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/VI_2015_005.pdf
) and of the degree of control of the risk (i.e. subjective ability to influence
the risk).
British respondents in 2002 (Poortinga and Pidgeon, 2003a) did not feel that
current rules and regulations in the UK were sufficient to control climate change.
More involvement from organisations separate from government and industry
was also called for. Overall, respondents felt the public should be involved/media/loftslag/Lorenzoni_Pidgeon_2006.pdf
of the most important
stakeholders, policymakers, water practitioners, involved
scientists, private sector, and civil society. This resulted in
a consultation round involving a minimum of ten experts in
each case-study, reflecting perspectives from different
stakeholder groups (see Fig. 2). A complete list of
respondents has been provided in Huntjens et al. (2007;
updated 2009).
By using standardized
/media/loftslag/Huntjens_etal-2010-Climate-change-adaptation-Reg_Env_Change.pdf
the viewpoints from the particular persons who have been participating in
the dialogue and shall not be considered a common viewpoint from neither Vattenfall nor the
energy sector in general. The persons involved in the dialogue are hereafter referred to as the
“dialogue group”.
The background for the stakeholder dialogue has been the intention of the CES project to
increase the stakeholder
/media/ces/ces-oslo2010_proceedings.pdf