the Fljótsdalsheiði region . . . . . . . 47
18 Seasonal mean wind power density within the Fljótsdalsheiði region . . . . . . . . 48
19 Directional mean wind power density within the Gufuskálar region . . . . . . . . . 49
20 Seasonal mean wind power density within the Gufuskálar region . . . . . . . . . . 50
21 Directional mean wind power density within the Hellisheiði region . . . . . . . . . 51
22 Seasonal mean
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2013/2013_001_Nawri_et_al.pdf
.................... 85
8
Figure 57 50% PM10 probability map for an eruption like 1362 at Öræfajökull ..................... 86
Figure 58 The probability of exceedance curve at key locations (Öræfajökull) ...................... 87
Figure 59 Tephra accumulation rate on the ground on 7 May 1982 (Öræfajökull) ................. 88
Figure 60 Tephra accumulation rate on the ground on 5 May 1981 (Öræfajökull
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2020/VI_2020_004.pdf
the com-
plexity of the hydrological processes through modelling, but its application is usually limited to
the short-range. Although the results demonstrated a great potential for this method, its success-
ful application in real-time will strongly depend on the quality and availability of streamflow
observations, which can be poor or simply missing during periods of variable durations, e.g
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2014/VI_2014_006.pdf