Grímsvötn volcano
Status Report: 16:00 GMT, 26 May 2011
Icelandic Meteorological Office and Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland
Compiled by: Sigurlaug Gunnlaugsdóttir, Gunnar B. Guðmundsson and Björn
Oddsson, with input from Gunnar Sigurðsson, Þórður Arason, Matthew
J. Roberts, Sigrún Hreinsdóttir and Sibylle von Löwis.
Based on: IMO seismic monitoring; IES-IMO GPS
/media/jar/Grimsvotn_status_2011-05-26_IES_IMO.pdf
operational and economic aspects
13:30 Operational aspects and economic implications of the volcanic ash issue Asgeir Pálsson, Isavia.
14:00 Impact of ash crisis on Icelandair operations, Hilmar B. Baldursson, Matthías Sveinbjörnsson
Possible near field models for Iceland
14:30 High resolution models and use of NAME at IMO Guðrún Nína Petersen, Halldór Björnsson,
Sigurður Jónsson and Sigurður
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/hlidarefni/program17012012.pdf
on Intraplate Seismicity in Central Fennoscandia
Annakaisa
Korja, Uski, M., Lund, B., Grigull, S., Nironen, M., E., Högdahl, K. Relative earthquake location in
Southern Iceland Bergþóra S. Þorbjarnardóttir and
Ingi Þ. Bjarnason This year's update on the Burträsk
fault seismicity Darina Buhcheva
and Björn LundThe SIL-system from an operational standpointJón Söring
Communication
between
/norsem/norsem2016/program/poster
than 30,000 earthquakes at 5–7 km depth, advancing in short bursts at 0.3–4.7 km/h. Following each
surge forward, the seismicity behind the dyke tip dropped, implying that the subsequent dyke opening
was mostly aseismic. More detailed analyses of the seismic data recorded by a dense network around
the Vatnajökull icecap have revealed small magnitude, long-period (LP or B-type) events which
/media/norsem/norsem_bryndis.pdf
The recent Bothnian Bay M4.1 earthquake: where, how and why?
B. Lund1, M. Uski2, H. Shomali1, D. Buhcheva1, S. Amini1, J. Kortström2
1Dep. of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
2Institute of Seismology, Dep. of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Finland
On 19 March 2016 a magnitude 4.1 earthquake occurred in the Bothnian Bay, between northern
Sweden
/media/norsem/norsem_lund.pdf
o
t
o
-
a
g
e
n
d
a
D
e
f
i
n
e
a
n
d
i
n
v
i
t
e
s
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
s
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
i
n
p
u
t
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
-
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
e
x
p
e
r
t
s
-
s
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
e
x
p
e
r
t
s
F
r
am
e
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
-
t
r
p
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
(
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
)
l
e
v
e
l
s
-
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
A
n
a
l
y
z
e
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
i
n
p
u
t
f
r
/media/loftslag/Outline_for_the_case_Road_maintenance_in_a_changing_climate.pdf
). Distribution of snow accumulation on the Svartisen ice cap, Norway, assessed by a model of orographic precipitation. Hydrological Processes, 22(19), 3998-400.
Other international
Crochet, P., Jóhannesson, T., Sigurðsson, O., Björnsson, H. & Pálsson, F. (2008). Modeling precipitation over complex terrain in Iceland. In: Sveinsson, Ó. G. B., S. M. Garðarsson and S. Gunnlaugsdóttir (eds.), Northern
/ces/publications/nr/1940
was chosen because after 1980 sea ice is fully initiated in RCAO
and after 2006 the records from the weather-stations end. (The stations actually continue to
4
Figure 2: mass balance profiles calculated using RCAO (Plot a) and
HIRHAM4 (Plot b) for model input.
measure, but in the short time available for the Paakitsoq mass balance project we did not
look for more data.) The reference period
/media/ces/ces_geus_paakitsoq_full_report.pdf
and the geographic extent of Figure 1b. Except where indicated, all networks are operated by
IMO, which displays data in real-time at http://www.vedur.is/english/. (b) Map of the Vat-
najökull ice cap, showing the 1 November 2004 eruption site and located earthquakes in the
month preceding the eruption. Epicenters in Skeidarárjökull outlet glacier represent icequakes
induced by the jökulhlaup
/media/jar/myndsafn/2005EO260001.pdf