Flugskýrsla TF-SIF
12. desember 2010
Flug nr. 117410.025
Áhöfn:
Flugstjóri Hafsteinn Heiðarsson
Flugmaður Jakob Ólafsson
Flugmaður 2 / Þjálfunarfl.
Yfirstýrimaður Auðunn F. Kristinsson
Stýrimaður Gunnar Örn Arnarson
Stýrimaður
Stýrimaður
Aðrir 9 farþegar, 4 til Akureyrar en 5 með allt flugið.
Flugtími:
Flugvöllur Hreyfing Flugtak Flugvöllur Lending
/media/hafis/skyrslur_lhg/Isskyrsla_20101212.pdf
from 5
years of continuous GPS measurements in
Iceland, submitted to Journal of Geophysical
VOLUME 86 NUMBER 26
28 JUNE 2005
PAGES 245–252
Eos, Vol. 86, No. 26, 28 June 2005
EOS, TRANSACTIONS, AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION
PAGES 245, 248
Forecasting and Monitoring a
Subglacial Eruption in Iceland
Fig. 1. (a) Map of Iceland illustrating the location of monitoring networks discussed in the text
/media/jar/myndsafn/2005EO260001.pdf
and planning. Finding a suitable
successor is crucial for human adaptation to
changing climate.
How did stationarity die? Stationarity is
dead because substantial anthropogenic
change of Earth’s climate is altering the
means and extremes of precipitation, evapo-
transpiration, and rates of discharge of rivers
(4, 5) (see figure, above). Warming aug-
ments atmospheric humidity and water
transport
/media/loftslag/Milly_etal-2008-Stationarity-dead-Science.pdf
to determine a global figure for economic
impact (From: EM-DAT 2008).
4 Based on baseline assessments of the case-studies in the NeWater-
project (http://www.newater.info).
264 P. Huntjens et al.
123
these case-studies, more specifically in their level of
AIWM.5 Therefore, this paper intends to identify differ-
ences and similarities in AIWM, to detect general patterns,
and to compare measures being
/media/loftslag/Huntjens_etal-2010-Climate-change-adaptation-Reg_Env_Change.pdf
and their interactions with sustainable develop-
Figure I.1. Schematic framework representing anthropogenic drivers, impacts of and responses to climate change, and their linkages.
Schematic framework of anthropogenic climate change drivers, impacts and responses
ment. Topic 5 assesses the relationship between adaptation and
mitigation on a more conceptual basis and takes a longer-term per-
spective. Topic 6
/media/loftslag/IPPC-2007-ar4_syr.pdf
m
J
M5 [C°] -3
obs. [C°] -4
nce 1
re 5. Comp
26); an int
temperatu
this system
y gridded v
picion abo
-Jökulsá w
similar dif
han observ
h elevation
ces the effe
months No
ly only on
high the tem
n band wi
refore be s
onthly tem
an Feb Ma
.2 -3.1 -3.
.3 -4.1 -3.
.1 1.0 0.6
arison of m
erpolation
re is shown
atic differe
alues, see T
ut the qual
atershed; b
ference wa
ations for t
gradient fo
/media/ces/2010_017.pdf
annual temperature varied from 5 C
to 2 C and precipitation from 450 mm to 700 mm (Drebs et al.,
2002). Finland is a long country and the temperature gradient is
strong especially in winter (Fig. 1a), which affects the accumula-
tion and melting of snow.
In south-western Finland the thermal winter lasts on average
for 100 days whereas in northern Finland this season is about
100 days longer
/media/ces/Journal_of_Hydrology_Veijalainen_etal.pdf
than can be expected to originate from the cauldrons, three to four times the wa-
ter equivalent of the accumulation of snow over the watershed of the cauldrons. It has
been estimated that flow from the cauldrons, in addition to the jökulhlaups, could be
2–5 m3 s 1 at maximum (Vatnaskil, 2005). It is possible that part of the sulfate-rich
groundwater from the glacier comes from the cauldrons
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2009/VI_2009_006_tt.pdf