the CES project at the conference on “Fundamentale prisdrivere i energimarkedena”, 17e november 2010, Oslo.
Ólafsson, H., Nordic Meteorology Meeting, Helsinki, 07.06.2010.
Ólafsson, O., Conf. 90 Anniversaire Icel. Meteorol. Office, Reykjavík, Iceland 14.12.2010.
Olafsson et al., European Geophysical Union, Vienna, 3-7 May 2010. Poster on Complex weather-related severe events in future climate
/ces/publications/nr/1680
Resources and Energy Directorate
Edited by: Heidi H. Pikkarainen
Print: Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate
Number printed: 130
Cover design: Rune Stubrud
Prepared for: The CES project
Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate
Middelthunsgate 29
P.O. Box 5091 Majorstua
N-0301 OSLO
NORWAY
Telephone: +47 22 959595
Fax: +47 22 9590 00
/media/ces/ces-oslo2010_proceedings.pdf
in sessions organised in conjunction with Arctic Circle by the
World Council of Churches and the Church of Iceland on "Just Peace with
the Earth", Thursday, and "Climate Justice" on Saturday. In both
events he gave a presentation and took part in round table discussions. Bartholomew I patriarch of the Orthodox church also
participated in the latter event.Sigrún Karlsdóttir, director of Natural Hazards
/about-imo/news/imo-at-the-arctic-circle-assembly-2017
movement. The operation of the seismographs was ceased in 1914 due to funding restrictions during World War I.
The operation of the seismographs was recommenced in 1925 and 1927 at the Icelandic Meteorological Office (IMO), where data processing was also conducted. Amplification of ground motion was low and even several felt earthquakes were not recorded. In 1951-1952, three Sprengnether short-period
/earthquakes-and-volcanism/conferences/jsr-2009/100_years/
(i. e. the location of the measuring point at each river) is also available as pdf (7.2 Mb). See Jökulsá á Fjöllum in the northeast, Markarfljót in the south and Haffjarðará in the west. The volcanic eruptions in March, April and May 2010 are shown in red.
Related topics
/hydrology/articles/nr/2110
The majority of the grid cells show
no significant change, however a
rising trend towards the end of the
century is noted (red curve).
2071 -2100 relative to 1961-90 [%]
Rossby Centre
i l d l Declines No change Increases
Changes in % for grid cells
with significant changes
Activities and results
reg ona mo e
and ECHAM4
Rossby Centre
regional model
and HadAM3
ECHAM4: A2 0.1 73.2 26.7
ECHAM4: B2 0.1
/media/ces/ces_wind_flyer-hq.pdf
The CES Risk Assessment Framework
for distribution companies
Climate risk assessment in
distribution companies in Denmark
Edward James-Smith
Ea Energy Analyses
Objectives
• VTT developed risk assessment framework for
hydro power generators
• Ea Energy Analyses role to adapt the
framework for use by grid companies
Methodology
• Qualitative methodology
• Case studies
– Two Danish grid companies
/media/ces/James-Smith_Edward_CES_2010.pdf