on water resources and regulation in Easters Finland. In O. G. B. Sveinsson, S. M. Garðarsson and S. Gunnlaugsdóttir (Eds.), Northern hydrology and its global role: XXV Nordic hydrological conference, Nordic Association for Hydrology, Reykjavík, Iceland August 11-13, 2008, pp 646-654. Reykjavík: Icelandic Hydrological Committee.
National
Mo, B., Wolfgang, O. & Styve, J. (2010). Climate change 2020
/ces/publications/nr/1937
From top-down to interactive economic assessments – example Finland
Adriaan Perrels1, Tony Rosqvist2, Hanna Virta1
1. Finnish Meteorological Institute FMI; 2. Technical Research Centre of Finland VTT
email address: adriaan.perrels@fmi.fi
Finland started to assess possible economic impacts of climate change as part of the so-called SILMU
program1 from 1992 to 1995. In that time it was still
/media/loftslag/NONAM_Perrels_ea_-_From_top-down_to_integrated_economic_assessment.pdf
to a slight inaccuracy in the calculations. The figure on the right loosely shows the relationship between m/s and a few Beaufort-values.
The prerequisites of the calculations above are:
The equation: W = 0.836B3/2 where W is windspeed in m/s and B is value on the Beaufort-scale.
1 m/s = 3.6 km/h = 1.944 knots (2.237 miles per hour)
Below is a detailed table with comparison between Beaufort
/weather/articles/nr/1283
). Icelandic perspectives on adaption to climate change Í: Climate sense : [WCC-3], consulting editor Ghassem R. Asrar. Tudor Rose, Leicester, s. 238-239.
Snorrason Á., Björnsson H., Harðardóttir J. (2010). The Climate and Energy Systems (CES) project: a summary of main results. XXVI Nordic hydrological conference, Riga, Latvia August 9-11 2010. Nordic hydrological programme report No. 51.
Snorrason, Á
/ces/publications/nr/1936
Eruption in Eyjafjallajökull
Status Report: 11:00 GMT, 7 June 2010
Icelandic Meteorological Office and Institute of Earth Sciences, University
of Iceland
Compiled by: Gunnar B. Guðmundsson, Sigurlaug Hjaltadóttir, Ármann Höskuldsson,
Björn Sævar Einarsson, Haraldur Eiríksson, Þorvaldur Þórðarsson, Guðrún
Larsen, Sigrún Hreinsdóttir and Bergthóra S. Thorbjarnardóttir.
Based on: IMO seismic
/media/jar/Eyjafjallajokull_status_2010-06-07_IES_IMO.pdf
to a slight inaccuracy in the calculations. The figure on the right loosely shows the relationship between m/s and a few Beaufort-values.
The prerequisites of the calculations above are:
The equation: W = 0.836B3/2 where W is windspeed in m/s and B is value on the Beaufort-scale.
1 m/s = 3.6 km/h = 1.944 knots (2.237 miles per hour)
Below is a detailed table with comparison between Beaufort
/weather/articles/nr/1283/
and 'C' stations for semi-permanent monitoring and
research purposes.
Table 4. Snapshot of stations status.
Status Number of A
stations
Number of B
stations
Number of C
stations
Total
number
On-line 19 29 5 53
Off-line 5 11 1 17
Total number 24 40 6 70
2.2 Equipment inventory
Currently inventory listings for stations and equipment in the CGPS network are far from
being up-to-date
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2011/2011_005.pdf
systems in Iceland
during the past 11 centuries: frequency, periodicity and implications. In Smellie JL and Chapman MG (eds):
Volcano-Ice Interactions on Earth and Mars. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 202: 81-90.
Larsen G, Guðmundsson MT, Einarsson P and Thordarson T. 2013. BÁRÐARBUNGA. In: Sólnes S,
Sigmundsson F, Bessason B (eds.): Náttúruvá á Íslandi - Eldgos og
/media/jar/Bardarbunga_kafli20140825.pdf