(CBA can be subset
of SCBA)
• CEA: cost-effectiveness analysis – this is used if for (a part of)
the intended impacts no (shadow) price can be established (or
when that is contentious)
26.8.2011Adriaan Perrels/IL 9
Cost-benefit analysis – the basics 2
• Metrics:
• Net present value (NPV) :
• Internal Rate of Return (IRR): r = r* such that NPV = 0
• Benefit-Cost Ratio (B/C ratio):
• Macro
/media/loftslag/Perrels-CBA.pdf
r
lev
el
,
GW
h
Sweden
Reference Echam Hadam
0 14 28 42 52
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
104
Week
Reservoi
r
lev
el
,
GW
h
Norway
0 14 28 42 52
0
500
1;000
1;500
2;000
2;500
3;000
3;500
Week
Reservoi
r
lev
el
,
GW
h
Finland
Sintef Energy Research Quantitative system analysis 11 of 21
Introduction
Electricity system model
Simulation results
Summary and concluding remarks
Hydropower
Thermal production
Energy
/media/ces/Mo_Birger_CES_2010.pdf
obstacles that is described in an appendix to the internal report listed above (IMO Int. Rep. 08003, the software is in the form of a library for the public doman software package R which may be downloaded from the internet) [Linux version (.tar.gz)] [Windows version (.zip)] [Documentation (.pdf)]
A map on a selected front page shows recent observations of avalanches. For user access
/avalanches/imo/protective/
). Icelandic perspectives on adaption to climate change Í: Climate sense : [WCC-3], consulting editor Ghassem R. Asrar. Tudor Rose, Leicester, s. 238-239.
Snorrason Á., Björnsson H., Harðardóttir J. (2010). The Climate and Energy Systems (CES) project: a summary of main results. XXVI Nordic hydrological conference, Riga, Latvia August 9-11 2010. Nordic hydrological programme report No. 51.
Snorrason, Á
/ces/publications/nr/1936
on Renewable Energy Sources: Their role in the Nordic energy system, Nord 2007:003, 140-153.
Keränen, J., Kilpeläinen, A., Gode, J., Molarius, R., Schabel, J. and James-Smith, E. (2010). Case study - Using the CES risk assessment framework in the biomass and wind power sectors. Conference on Future Climate and Renewable Energy: Impacts, Risks and Adaptation, 31.5.-2.6.2010, Oslo, Norway
/ces/publications/nr/1939
the results from the CES project?
– Relevance
– Communication
– Improvements
Stakeholder Relevance of the CES Project
Jenny Gode, 31 May 2010
Dialogue meetings
square4 3 meetings with stakeholder = "the dialogue group"
– Different positions: from R&D, heat production, back up
responsibility and up to strategic level
square4 Discussions with other stakeholder within Risk
Assessment task
– Different
/media/ces/Gode_Jenny_CES_2010.pdf
size of RCM runs. Currently there exist only two scenario runs covering Greenland
available but there will soon be new runs available, for instance from the EU FP7 project
"ice2sea".
References
Aðalgeirsdóttir, G., M. Stendel, J. H. Christensen, J. Cappelen, F. Vejen, H. A. Kjær, R. Mot-
tram, and P. Lucas-Picher (2009), Assessment of the temperature, precipitation and snow
in the RCM HIRHAM4
/media/ces/ces_geus_paakitsoq_full_report.pdf
: to use or not to use?
*O'Neill, R. V., and A. W. King. 1998, Homage to St. Michael; or, why are there so
many books on scale?: Pages 3–15 in D. L. Peterson and V. T. Parker (editors).
Ecological scale: theory and applications. Columbia University Press, New York.
• Robert O’Neill questions the unifying capabilities*
• Aspects of the land use system have different scale properties
• To use
/media/loftslag/Kok_1-scenarios-lecture-1.pdf
of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Baker, M., S. Hincks, and G. Sherriff. 2010. Getting
involved in plan making: participation and
stakeholder involvement in local and regional
spatial strategies in England. Environment and
Planning C: Government and Policy 28
(4):574-594.
Biggs, R., C. Raudsepp-Hearne, C. Atkinson-
Palombo, E. Bohensky, E. Boyd, G. Cundill, H. Fox,
S. Ingram, K. Kok, S. Spehar, M
/media/loftslag/Kok_and_Veldkamp_editorial_ES-2011-4160.pdf