d
W
i
n
d
p
o
w
.
M
et
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
for
u
s
i
n
g c
l
ima
t
e
s
c
e
nar
i
o
t
o
ad
j
u
st
s
t
o
c
h
a
s
tic
ser
i
e
sEA Analyse A/S
Optensys Energianalys
SINTEF
E
n
er
g
y
s
yste
m
Implementation in EMPS
E
M
PS
–
S
IN
T
E
F
Simulation
Documentation: assumptions, simulation results
H
y
d
ro i
n
f
l
o
w
Forecasts
Assumptions for energy system in
different cases.
St
o
c
h
as
t
i
c
/media/ces/esa_flyer_new.pdf
requires an appropriate monitoring system and the use of integrated or more simple models
for the prediction of future scenarios including effects of implemented measures. Such
integrated models should also include socio-economic aspects. In the Netherlands for the
Major sources of uncertainty in current IWRM practice
Tabl
e
1
St
ep
1:
Es
ta
bl
ish
st
at
us
an
d
go
al
s
Pr
oces
s
in
Ste
p
1
Es
tablis
/media/loftslag/VanderKeur_etal-2008-Uncertainty_IWRM-WARM.pdf
at
e
(C
limat
e
models
)
GC
M
s
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
RCM
s
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
Initia
lco
n
ditions
/
nat
ura
lva
riabilit
y
X
X
XX
X
D
ow
ns
ca
lin
g/
sta
tis
tic
al
co
rr
ec
tio
n
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
W
ate
r
syst
em
impact
s
(H
yd
ro
-e
co
lo
gi
ca
lm
o
de
ls)
X
X
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Socio
-econo
m
ic
imp
act
s
(So
ci
o-
ec
on
om
ic
to
ol
s)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XX
X
X
X
A
da
pt
ati
on
m
ea
su
re
s
X
X
X
X
/media/loftslag/2012-Refsgaard_etal-uncertainty_climate-change-adaptation-MITI343.pdf
is
ar
tic
le
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Identif
ygenera
lform
so
f
pa
rt
ici
pa
to
ry
m
o
de
llin
g
Tabl
e1
.
Co
m
pa
ris
o
n
o
ff
ra
m
ew
o
rk
s
fo
r
ca
te
go
riz
in
g
pa
rt
ic
ip
at
o
ry
m
o
de
llin
g
pr
o
ce
ss
es
.
Th
is
ta
bl
e
co
m
pa
re
s
di
ffe
re
n
tf
ra
m
ew
o
rk
s
(bo
ld
,
fir
st
co
lu
m
n
)a
cc
o
rdin
gt
o
th
e
categorica
lcriteri
a
the
yemplo
y(column
si
n
italics
)an
d
thei
rpurpos
e
(bold
,fina
/media/loftslag/Hare-2011-ParticipatoryModelling.pdf
the results for all catchments, with
that method. The deterministic predictions were also compared to two benchmark determinis-
tic predictions, i) monthly climate in the period 1961–2000, i.e. F(t0 +D) = E[A(M)], and ii)
persistence, i.e. F(t0 +D) = A(t0), where F is the forecast and A the observation or analysis.
Figures 5 to 8 present the scatter plots of observed temperature and precipitation versus
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2014/VI_2014_006.pdf
power delivery
Finances and risk Financial resources concentrated in structural protection
(sunk costs)
Financial resources diversified using a broad set of private
and public financial instruments
Climate change adaptation in European river basins 267
123
Tabl
e
2
Overvie
w
o
fvariable
s
an
d
indicator
s
fo
rAIW
M
Dimensio
n
Variabl
e
Indicato
r
Literatur
e
(A
)Agenc
y
1.
Typ
e
o
fleadershi
p
/media/loftslag/Huntjens_etal-2010-Climate-change-adaptation-Reg_Env_Change.pdf
frequency distributions for Re-
gion 1 derived with index flood model no. 6: bµ(D) = a(AP=Z)b ............................ 39
5
Appendix VI - Empirical and modeled daily flood frequency distributions for
Region 2 derived with index flood model no. 3: bµ(D) = a(APm)b ......................... 41
Appendix VII - Instantaneous Index flood models for Region 1. .......................... 43
Appendix VIII
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2014/VI_2014_001.pdf
presents the study area and data. Sec-
tion 3 describes the methodology. Section 4 presents the results and Section 5 concludes the
report.
2 Study area and data
2.1 River basins
Rivers in Iceland are often classified according to the origin of flow (Rist, 1990): direct runoff
(D), spring-fed (L), glacier-fed (J) and whether they flow through lakes (S). Twelve river basins
were selected for this study
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2015/VI_2015_009.pdf
and
e mean
ing the
polated
atically
Figure
he cold
nd then
e lower
narrow
tic melt
han for
Sandá
modelle
constra
not don
Table
Month
Mean M
Mean ob
Differen
Figu
(vhm
and M
í Þistilfirð i
d tempera
ints and sin
e.
4. Mean m
Ja
M5 [C°] -5.
s. [C°] -7.
ce 1.
re 6. Comp
144); an i
M5 tempe
and were
ture data
ce this was
onthly tem
n Feb Mar
9 -5.7 -5.7
2 -6.8 -6.4
3 1.1 0.7
/media/ces/2010_017.pdf
/EPP 2
Stakeholders analysis
26 August 2011 PM/YZ/EPP 3
Stake
h
o
l
d
e
r
s
P
u
b
l
i
c
/
p
r
i
v
at
e
P
o
w
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
(“
n
u
i
s
an
ce”
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
)
O
r
i
e
n
tat
i
o
n
H
or
s
t
e
n
s
m
uni
c
ipal
i
t
y
(
c
o
m
pe
t
e
n
t
a
u
t
h
ori
t
y
)
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
t
ron
g
Go
v
ernanc
e
N
eighbour mun
i
c
i
p
ali
t
y
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
t
ron
g
Go
v
ernanc
e
Poli
c
y
/media/loftslag/Group5-Stakeholders_involvement.pdf