Denmark, DK). Participatory planning processes - Group model building
10:00 p9 Simo Haanpää (Aalto University, Fi). Ilmasto-opas.fi (ClimateGuide.fi) web portal - a new tool for managing climate change in Finnish municipalities
10:30 tea/coffee break
11:00 break out sessions : Thursday cases revisited
12:00 - 13:00 lunch
13:00 p10
Helle Katrine Andersen (DANVA, Dk). DANVA CC adaptation plan
/nonam/workshop/program/
to c. 10% increase
Uncertainty related to choice of GCM
• Changing seasonality (2021-2050 vs 1961-1990)
in Sweden
T2m Precipitation Wind speed
Colored lines represent averages over RCMs forced by the same GCM
Gray field is max/min of all RCM simulations
An example of CC in the next few decades
2011-2040
vs
1961-1990
Why are differences between ensemble
members so large?
Winter (DJF)
M
S
L
P
T
2
/media/ces/Kjellstrom_Erik_CES_2010.pdf
accumulation rate on the ground on 21 September 1983 (Hekla) ............... 57
Figure 31 Tephra accumulation rate on the ground on 9 June 1986 (Hekla) ........................... 58
Figure 32 Tephra accumulation rate on the ground in Geysir (Hekla) .................................... 59
Figure 33 Event Tree for Katla volcano
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2020/VI_2020_004.pdf
and volcanoes. Red shaded
bands show the 5 to 95% range for 58 simulations from 14 climate models using both natural and anthropogenic forcings. {WGI Figure SPM.4}
Difficulties remain in simulating and attributing observed tem-
perature changes at smaller scales. On these scales, natural climate
variability is relatively larger, making it harder to distinguish changes
expected due to external forcings
/media/loftslag/IPPC-2007-ar4_syr.pdf
) ................................................................ 46
3.3.3 The Hengill area and the South Iceland seismic zone (boxes G-M) ............ 48
3.3.4 Active faults in 2000 .................................................................................... 56
3.4 Depth distribution, stress drop and thickness of the brittle crust .......................... 58
4 Discussion
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2010/2010_003rs.pdf
SE +56:52:00 +14:48:00 166 TP
2 FALUN SE +60:37:00 +15:37:00 160 T
4 LINKOEPING SE +58:24:00 +15:31:59 93 T
5 LINKOEPING-MALMSLAETT SE +58:24:00 +15:31:59 93 T
8 OESTERSUND SE +63:10:59 +14:28:59 376 T
9 OESTERSUND-FROESOEN SE +63:10:59 +14:28:59 376 T
10 STOCKHOLM
/media/ces/CES_D2.4_task1.pdf
). It was widely felt in the capital area and in Akranes. Another magnitude 3.1 event was measured earlier the same day at 11:58 at the same location. Hypocenter depths of the earthquakes were around 3-4 km.
This earthquake sequence started in the morning around 10:00 and so far more than 100 events have been detected. Focal mechanisms of the largest events show normal faulting movements (vertical
/about-imo/news/nr/3138
in Reykjavík
6.3.2013
As everyone is aware of, very bad weather is prevalent in all of the country. Reykjavík is unusually hard hit by winds and snow. Following is the weather forecast, issued at 15:58, but users of the web are advised to observe the frequently updated maps
/about-imo/news/nr/2665