at each site i with the same method used to estimate qR(D;T ), but instead of pooling
AMF series for a given duration D from different sites, the estimation is made individually for
each site i by pooling AMF series for different durations D (see Crochet, 2012c). The index
flood µi(D), is modeled at each site i as a continuous function of D, as follows:
µi(D) =
µi
1+(D=Di)li
; (5)
where µi, Di/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2014/VI_2014_001.pdf
Veðurstofa Íslands
2 Almannavarnadeild Ríkislögreglustjóra
3 Jarðvísindastofnun Háskólans
4 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Bologna
5 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Pisa
6 Jarðvísindadeild Háskóla Íslands
7 Agricultural University of Iceland
8 Consultant
Skýrsla nr. Dags. ISSN Opin Lokuð
VÍ 2020-011 Desember 2020 1670-8261 Skilmálar:
Heiti skýrslu
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2020/VI_2020_011_en.pdf
The hydrological simulations were performed with the Wa-
tershed Simulation and Forecasting System (WSFS) developed
and operated in the Finnish Environment Institute (Vehviläinen
et al., 2005). The WSFS is used in Finland for operational hydrolog-
ical forecasting and flood warnings (www.environment.fi/water-
forecast/), regulation planning and research purposes
(Vehviläinen and Huttunen, 1997
/media/ces/Journal_of_Hydrology_Veijalainen_etal.pdf
by the
inhabitants on a daily basis for driving between towns and villages
for work, school, hobbies or di?erent services. Public avalanche
bulletins are also published for selected areas, aimed towards the
increasing number of backcountry travellers in Iceland during
winter time. The number of human-triggered avalanches recorded
by the Meteorological O>ce has increased substantially over
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/arsskyrslur/VI_Arsskyrsla_2018_vef.pdf
-based and 10 based on IPCC GCM
simulations. The choice of the GCM models was based on their SAT
performance for the present-day climate near Iceland as mentioned above.
2. For GCM-based scenarios, temperature change in the highland interior of
Iceland, where the large ice caps are located, were increased by 25% based on
the results of RCM downscaling (Nawri & Björnsson, 2010).
3. Expected
/media/ces/2010_016.pdf
in a collaboration between the Austrian engineering company Ingenieurbüro
Illmer Daniel e.U. (DI), Efla consulting engineers and the Icelandic Meteorological Office (IMO).
Daniel Illmer carried out the analysis of landslide protection measures, Jón Kristinn Helgason,
Tómas Jóhannesson and Eiríkur Gíslason wrote sections about the geographical setting, the land-
slide history and the assessment
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2016/VI_2016_006_rs.pdf
the analysis will allow us to present the
outline for a new, potentially more robust and
comprehensive design process. The outline as
presented here consists of principles, phases and
their interior steps, and tools for participation
processes.
We will now turn to the various elements of the
potential new guide. We will start by presenting the
principles of design, followed by the steps and tools
/media/loftslag/vonKorff_etal-2010.pdf