are photographs, maps and graphs that show the main results of measurements
and analyses that are available, now two weeks after the event.
Width of fracture line: 800 m
Vertical drop: 350 m
Runout length beyond the lake shore: ~1000 m
Volume: ~30–50 million m³
Estimated duration of the slide: 20 seconds according to seismographs
Travel time of tsunami across the lake: 1–2 minutes
/media/ofanflod/myndasafn/frodleikur/askja_minnisblad_ens.pdf
Countries
• Led by University of Oslo, IMO, Geus, DMI and
FMI
• Scale: 40 MNOK from TFI
HA-3: Outreach and dissemination, PI: Signe Bech Andersen, GEUS Contributing partners: All
HA-1: Joint Educational Program, PI: Jon Ove Hagen, UiO Contributing
partners: All
SVALI NCoE: Overview of themes, research work packages and horizontal activities
Climate Change Impacts
/media/ces/Snorrason_Arni_CES_2010.pdf
) ................................................................ 46
3.3.3 The Hengill area and the South Iceland seismic zone (boxes G-M) ............ 48
3.3.4 Active faults in 2000 .................................................................................... 56
3.4 Depth distribution, stress drop and thickness of the brittle crust .......................... 58
4 Discussion
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2010/2010_003rs.pdf
out, adding to the results and making them more precise. Below are photographs, maps and graphs that show the main results of measurements and analyses that are available, now two weeks after the event.
Width of fracture line: 800 m
Vertical drop: 350 m
Runout length beyond the lake shore: ~1000 m
Volume: ~30–50 million m³
Estimated duration of the slide: 20 seconds according to seismographs
/avalanches/articles/nr/2929
in Icelandic.
Introduction
The present project belongs to Gosvá, a national collaborative research programme on the assessment of volcanic hazard risks in Iceland led by the Icelandic Meteorological Office (IMO). The programme's steering committee is composed of representatives from IMO, the Institute of Earth Sciences (IES, University of Iceland), the Department of Civil Protection and Emergency
/hydrology/hazard-risk-assessments/glacial-outburst-floods/markarfljotsaurar-oraefajokull/
scenarios (WS1 and WS2)
Narrative stories were developed during two consecutive workshops. In essence, stakeholders were given a large degree of
freedom to develop their own scenarios, which in most cases led to a set of nal storylines in which the fast-track starting points
were recognisable only in broad outlines. It was stressed that text, key arguments, and triggering events could all
/media/loftslag/Kok_et_al._TFSC_published_2011.pdf
with constant stress drop. The radius is given by
wMw
M
MC 5.03
1.9
3 0 10
16
107
16
7
)( σσ Δ
⋅=Δ= , (4)
where ∆σ is the stress drop (see Appendix A and Hanks Kanamori, 1979). In the last term the
seismic moment has been replaced by 101.5M+9.1. When g = 0.5 the form R = r + K·C(M) gives
equivalent results to the form R = r + k·10g·M when fitted to the data – the only difference
between
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2009/VI_2009_012.pdf
and thinn ed greatly since the end of the th century, when the glacier
reached its maximum extent in re cent tim s. The foreland
of Hoffellsjökull provides uni que opportunities to observe the geo morpho logi cal effects of glacier retreat. In , the
retreat of the glacier led to the formation of a terminus lake that has grown rapidly every year since then. The area of Hof fellsjökull has
/media/Eplicanámskeið/VAT_newsletter_2018_06.pdf