The closed area around the eruption site is demarcated by lines drawn
sequentially between the points listed in the table below:
Number Latitude Longitude
1 64,796 17,310
2 64,853 17,017
3 65,085 16,769
4 65,109 16,325
5 65,616 16,261
6 65,534 16,009
7 65,174 15,909
8 64,682 16,753
NATIONAL COMMISSIONER OF THE ICELANDIC POLICE
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL PROTECTION
/media/jar/Access_conrolled_area_20150213.pdf
Earthquake table
The table displays the map and graph data in tabulated form. The first two columns denote the date and GMT time of the earthquake, respectively. Columns 3 and 4 detail the location of the epicentre in decimal units of latitude and longitude. Columns 5 and 6 approximate the focal depth (the distance from the hypocenter to the epicentre) and the magnitude of the earthquake
/earthquakes-and-volcanism/articles/nr/1225
), latitude (decimal °N), longitude (decimal °W), location uncertainty (km), and a
quality indicator (G=Good).
Three tables are provided showing mean and median locations of lightning for 1, 6 and 24
hour intervals during the past week (Meðalstaðsetningar). For each time interval (Tímabil)
the following data are presented: Number of lightning in Iceland (Fjöldi eldinga), mean
location, latitude °N
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2013/VI_2013_006.pdf
longitude
• Conversion process from Sunshine Hours
to Solar Irradiation
Data Source: UKCP09 gridded data set observed data (5km x 5km)
UK Solar Resource
present and future
Sunshine Hours to Solar Irradiation
• Suehrcke conversion method
• Performed conversion on each grid cell for
each month of each year from 1961 to 1990
• Averaged the results for each month and
season
Solar Irradiation Monthly
/media/ces/Burnett_Dougal_CES_2010.pdf
° latitude-longitude grid.
Verification
One grid point (60°N, 25°E) was selected for comparing the surface geostrophic wind speeds in the 10
GCMs with the corresponding observed geostrophic winds, which were derived from the ERA-40
reanalyses. In general, the monthly average Vg in the model simulations was found to be nearly equal
to the corresponding observed mean (Fig. 1). However, during
/media/ces/CES_D2.4_task2_CMIP3_winds.pdf
afterwards,
strong social interactions and converging prosperity worldwide, rapid development and spread of
new technologies, and a balanced use of fossil and non-fossil energy sources.
The monthly fields from the various general circulation model (GCM) runs are interpolated onto a
common 2 2-degree grid within the domain from 10–28 W in longitude, and 62–68 N in latitude,
covering Iceland as the only land
/media/ces/2010_005_.pdf
of earthquakes all having low relative location error, within
100 m in latitude and longitude and 300 m in depth, as displayed in Figure 5. Cluster 1,
farthest west, consists of 12 earthquakes, which occurred in August and September 1999
at 6–6.5 km depth, just at the bottom of the suggested intrusion. Cluster 2, a group six
events, thereof four well located, is located just off the southern rim
/media/vedurstofan/utgafa/skyrslur/2009/VI_2009_013.pdf
19 CMIP3 GCMs are used (Table 2.1). The horizontal grid spacing of these
models varies from 1.1 q latitude × 1.1 q longitude to 4 q latitude × 5 q longitude. For each
2 Some of the RCM simulations in the ENSEMBLES data base were conducted with funding from other sources,
including CES.
5
model, a 198-year time series (1901-2098) obtained
/media/ces/D2.3_CES_Prob_fcsts_GCMs_and_RCMs.pdf
in Table
2.1.
Some potential limitations of using the CMIP3 ensemble for probabilistic climate change
forecasting should be mentioned. First, current GCMs still have a relatively coarse horizontal
resolution. Within the CMIP3 ensemble, the grid spacing varies from 1.1 q latitude × 1.1 q
longitude to 4 q latitude × 5 q longitude (for the analysis presented here, all the model results
were
/media/ces/raisanen_ruosteenoja_CES_D2.2.pdf