technique ....................................... 17
7. Sensitivity to the forecast method and the emission scenario....................................... 20
8. Conclusions..................................................................................................................... 24
References
/media/ces/raisanen_ruosteenoja_CES_D2.2.pdf
Spatial perception of flood hazard in the urban area of Selfoss
Emmanuel P. Pagneux 1, 2
1 Icelandic Meteorological Office
Grensásvegur 9 – 108 Reykjavík – ICELAND
2 Department of Geography and Tourism
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences / School of Engineering and Sciences
University of Iceland
Aska, Sturlugata 7 – 101 Reykjavík – ICELAND
Email: emmanuel@vedur.is
/media/loftslag/Spatial_perception_of_flood_hazard_in_the_urban_area_of_Selfoss,_Iceland.pdf
Scales as mentioned in Cash et al. (2006)
space time juris. inst. man. netw. know. other
Van Apeldoorn et al. 2011 XXX
Mandemaker et al. 2011 XXXX
Van der Veen and Tagel 2011 XXX
De Blaeij et al. 2011 XXXX (spatial) beneficiaries,
ecosystem services
Turnhout and Boonman-Berson 2011 XX
Van Lieshout et al. 2011 XX agricultural
juris. = jurisdictional
inst. = institutional
man
/media/loftslag/Kok_and_Veldkamp_editorial_ES-2011-4160.pdf
at 67 sites: (a) 100-year floods with the Gumbel
distribution and (b) average discharge.
−6
0
−4
0
−2
0
0
20
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 89 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Scenario number
Change in 100a Flood (%
)
Fig. 5. Box plot (median, 25 and 75 percentiles, average [diamond], max and min) of changes in 100-year floods in 2070–2099 at the 67 sites with different scenarios.
Numbering of the scenarios
/media/ces/Journal_of_Hydrology_Veijalainen_etal.pdf
& implementation
6. Information management & sharing
7. Finances and cost recovery
8. Risk management
9. Effectiveness of (international) regulation
As a useful starting point for operationalization, we
considered the River Basin Assessment framework devel-
oped by Raadgever et al. (2008). Raadgever et al. devel-
oped a framework including four regime elements (4–7).
Based on relevant literature (see
/media/loftslag/Huntjens_etal-2010-Climate-change-adaptation-Reg_Env_Change.pdf
a probability of an
adverse event occurring and a measure of the
associated event. Larger consequence and larger
probability lead to a larger overall risk (e.g. Risk =
Probability x Damage)
Conclusions – Part 1
Terminology
• Be aware of ambiguities in terminology used by others –
and be specific defining the terminology you use
Concepts
• Uncertainty assessment should influence the entire
/media/loftslag/Refsgaard_2-uncertainty.pdf
We are hoping to find time to improve this glossary. Only a few items are available. For your relevant search, please click on one of the letters below:
A Á B C D E É F G H I Í J K L M N O Ó P Q R S T U Ú V W X Y Ý Z Þ Æ Ö
A
A: Icelandic abbreviation of East (compass direction, easterly, eastern).
ANA: Icelandic abbreviation of Eastnorthesast (compass direction).
ASA: Icelandic
/weather/articles/nr/1208
We are hoping to find time to improve this glossary. Only a few items are available. For your relevant search, please click on one of the letters below:
A Á B C D E É F G H I Í J K L M N O Ó P Q R S T U Ú V W X Y Ý Z Þ Æ Ö
A
A: Icelandic abbreviation of East (compass direction, easterly, eastern).
ANA: Icelandic abbreviation of Eastnorthesast (compass direction).
ASA: Icelandic
/weather/articles/nr/1208/