we take the corresponding
data from the CMIP5 project.
Table 1. All GCMs and RCMs used in this study. If a model is available for any of the
domains Arctic-44, EURO-44, or EURO-11, it is marked with a v, but with an x if it is
unavailable.
Model name Type EURO-11 EURO-44 Arctic-44
CCCma-CanESM2 GCM x v v
COSMO-CLM4-8-17 RCM v v x
CNRM-CERFACS-CNRM-CM5 GCM v v x
IHCEC-EC-Earth GCM v v v
/media/vedurstofan-utgafa-2017/VI_2017_009.pdf
of System
Objectives
Bias Correction
from NCDC observations
from PCM historical runraw climate scenario
bias-corrected climate scenario
month m month m
Note: future scenario temperature trend (relative to control run)
removed before, and replaced after, bias-correction step.
Spatial Downscaling
observed
mean fields
(1/8-1/4 degree)
monthly PCM
anomaly (T42)
VIC-scale
monthly simulation
/media/ces/Lettenmaier_Dennis_CES_2010pdf.pdf
Projects
involving sh
Concise info
Executive
summaries
Downloadable
"Stakeholder
friendly" info
Stakeholder Relevance of the CES Project
Jenny Gode, 31 May 2010
Research programme
"Translators"
F
act
sheets
W
eb
page
Stee
ring
co
m
m
ittee
Visits
W
o
rkshops
R
efe
re
nce
g
ro
up
s
E
x
.
su
m
m
a
rie
s
M
eetings
Stakeholders
Energy companies
Energy authorities
Decision makers
Other stakeholders
/media/ces/Gode_Jenny_CES_2010.pdf
of the first mover as follows:
EUi1 = pi1(vi1(X∗i1)+wi1(X2))+ (1 − pi1)(vi1(Xi1)+wi1(X2)) (8)
with X∗i1 being the certainty-equivalent of Xi1 through the utility function of Fehr and
Schmidt (1999). As wi1(X2) is the same in both states of nature, it will not affect agents’
preferences. This specification avoids the question of how to include the first mover’s risk
aversion regarding the second mover’s
/media/loftslag/Public-Choice-2012---Teyssier---Inequity-and-risk-aversion-in-sequential-public-good-games.pdf
st
c
o
ve
r
(%
)
8x8
y = -17.1Ln(x) + 67
R2 = 0.82
F
o
re
st
c
o
ve
r
(%
)
4 4
y = -4.2x + 65
R2 = 0.94
30
40
50
6
0 2 4 6
l ti it
F
o
re
st
c
o
ve
r
(%
)
2 2
Hypothetical aggregation error
by upscaling non-linear relationships
Observed from hypothetical exampleTheo etical under inning (Rastetter, 1992)
Spatial scale – Dominant cells
Conclusions - scale
• “Scale” has been on the (land use
/media/loftslag/Kok_1-scenarios-lecture-1.pdf